4.6 Article

Lycopene powers the inhibition of glycation-induced diabetic nephropathy: A novel approach to halt the AGE-RAGE axis menace

Journal

BIOFACTORS
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages 372-381

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/biof.1238

Keywords

advanced glycation end-products (AGEs); receptor for AGEs (RAGEs); lycopene; d-ribose; NF-B; MMP-2

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, [141 - 548 - D1435]
  2. DSR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are accumulating evidences suggesting that interaction between advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and their receptors (RAGEs) induces oxidative stress and subsequently encourages inflammatory reactions, thereby resulting in progressive alteration in renal architecture and function. Interventions that reduce the tissue burden of AGEs have yielded significant positive results in inhibiting the progression of diabetic complications such as diabetic nephropathy. Lycopene, a carotenoid, plays an important role in protection against oxidative stress and hence might prove an efficient antiglycating agent. Current study investigates the effect of lycopene in downregulating the menace caused by ribose-induced glycation both in vitro and in vivo. We observed that treatment with lycopene decelerated the ribose induced AGE formation in HK-2 cells and in rat kidneys thereby downregulating the expression RAGE. HK-2 cells with decreased levels of RAGE showed a decline in nuclear factor B (NFB) and matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP 2) expressions. Administration of ribose not only induced hyperglycemia in Wistar rats but also developed diabetic nephropathy (DN). However, lycopene was found effective in relieving the biochemical symptoms of DN. Thus lycopene provides protection against development of diabetic nephropathy and ameliorates renal function by halting AGE-RAGE axis. (c) 2015 BioFactors, 41(5):372-381, 2015.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available