4.5 Article

Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies for Organic Wheat Production: Crop Yield and Nitrate Leaching

Journal

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages 770-781

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2015.0464

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. MiPAAF, Ministero Italiano delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen fertility management represents a crucial aspect for common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production, particularly when we deal with organic agriculture. This study was conducted to determine the effect of five N fertilization strategies on yield, grain protein content, and N leaching risk. In a 3-yr field experiment, a faba bean/wheat temporary intercropping (TIC) and four fertilization treatments with extra-farm N sources were compared. Extra-farm N sources were represented by blood meal (BM) and roasted leather (RL) (broadcast all-at-once at seeding or split into one-half at seeding and one-half at tillering in a side-dressing application). Unfertilized and mineral fertilized controls were included. The effect of the legume on TIC wheat N uptake was always positive while dry weight accumulation and yield were generally poorly affected. Regardless of the broadcasting method, BM treatments generally showed a slightly higher yield and grain protein content compared to wheat fertilized with roasted leather (this was also confirmed by fertilizer release efficiency). The risk of N leaching was maximum at the onset of drainage (i.e., during the first phase of crop growth), so using organic fertilizers at pre-seeding stage appeared to be a very risky practice, especially if quick-N-releasing ones are used. Splitting the organic fertilizer rate avoided a large amount of mineralized N to be leached in the watershed during the critical stage of drainage onset. The TIC was the best option in terms of environmental preservation, and assured a constantly higher grain protein content compared to the other organic fertilization treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available