4.7 Article

Perennial, species-rich wildflower strips enhance pest control and crop yield

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages 97-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.001

Keywords

Conservation biological control (CBC); Functional biodiversity; Habitat management; Natural enemies; Semi-natural habitat; Sown field margin

Funding

  1. Hauser foundation
  2. Sur-La-Croix foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effectiveness of agri-environment schemes (AES) such as wildflower strips in promoting farmland biodiversity has been relatively well studied. Their effects on biodiversity-mediated ecosystem services, such as natural pest control, in contrast, remain poorly evaluated and their consequences on crop yield largely unexplored. We assessed the effect of sown, species-rich, perennial wildflower strips, promoted through the Swiss AES, on pest control services and their consequences for crop yield in nearby winter wheat. We found strong reductions in cereal leaf beetle Oulema sp. (CLB) density (eggs: 44%, larvae: 66%) and crop damage (40%) caused by CLB in winter wheat besides wildflower strips (N = 10) compared with control fields without wildflower strip (N = 10). Moreover, average crop yield was increased by 10% in winter wheat next to wildflower strips up to 10 m into the fields. Wheat yield was positively associated with broad leaved plant cover, flower density and diversity of nearby flower strips, yet collinearity with wheat density made these effects difficult to disentangle. Our study demonstrates that diverse wildflower strips with known benefits for farmland biodiversity can also promote biological pest control and crop yield. This creates a win-win situation for crop production and biodiversity conservation, through which such AES may contribute to ecological intensification. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available