4.7 Article

The impact of different cutting regimes on population density of Jacobaea aquatica (Hill) G. Gaertn., B. Mey. & Scherb. and grassland vegetation

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages 18-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.04.018

Keywords

Senecio aquaticus; Management; Marsh ragwort; Poisonous plant; Toxicity; Weed control

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management
  2. Federal States of Austria
  3. Jubilaumsfonds of the Austrian Nationalbank

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Jacobaea aquatica is a monocarpic Asteraceae growing in wet grasslands of low management intensity. It is considered a noxious weed because it contains pyrrolizidine alkaloids, which cause health problems to livestock. The aim of this study was to develop management options to reduce the population density off. aquatica in meadows of high nature conservation value without negative impacts on plant species diversity. The study site is located at the Hercynian part of Lower Austria near the city of Gmund. The effect of five different cutting regimes on population density and seed production off. aquatica as well as on species richness of the surrounding vegetation was tested on permanent plots from 2007 to 2012. One cut in October diminished J. aquatica but species richness decreased. Two cuts during the peak flowering period (July and August) and October reduced the population density of J. aquatica by c. 70% without obvious loss of species richness. Traditionally practiced two cuts in June and September lead to a rapid population growth off. aquatica. According to our results, a first cut in June providing non-toxic fodder and two additional cuts during peak flowering are appropriate to reduce J. aquatica and to maintain biodiversity. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available