4.6 Article

Oral trehalose supplementation improves resistance artery endothelial function in healthy middle-aged and older adults

Journal

AGING-US
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 1167-1183

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100962

Keywords

aging; trehalose; endothelium-dependent dilation; large elastic artery stiffness; oxidative stress

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [AG044031-02, TR001082, AG013038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We hypothesized that supplementation with trehalose, a disaccharide that reverses arterial aging in mice, would improve vascular function in middle-aged and older (MA/O) men and women. Thirty-two healthy adults aged 50-77 years consumed 100 g/day of trehalose (n=15) or maltose (n=17, isocaloric control) for 12 weeks (randomized, double-blind). In subjects with Delta body mass<2.3kg (5 lb.), resistance artery endothelial function, assessed by forearm blood flow to brachial artery infusion of acetylcholine (FBFACh), increased similar to 30% with trehalose (13.3 +/- 1.0 vs. 10.5 +/- 1.1 AUC, P=0.02), but not maltose (P=0.40). This improvement in FBFACh was abolished when endothelial nitric oxide (NO) production was inhibited. Endothelium-independent dilation, assessed by FBF to sodium nitroprusside (FBFSNP), also increased similar to 30% with trehalose (155 +/- 13 vs. 116 +/- 12 AUC, P=0.03) but not maltose (P=0.92). Changes in FBFACh and FBFSNP with trehalose were not significant when subjects with Delta body mass >= 2.3kg were included. Trehalose supplementation had no effect on conduit artery endothelial function, large elastic artery stiffness or circulating markers of oxidative stress or inflammation (all P>0.1) independent of changes in body weight. Our findings demonstrate that oral trehalose improves resistance artery (microvascular) function, a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, in MA/O adults, possibly through increasing NO bioavailability and smooth muscle sensitivity to NO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available