Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.AD8 Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Impairment: Pragmatic Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study
A. J. Larner
JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGY (2015)
The descriptive epidemiology of delirium symptoms in a large population-based cohort study: results from the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS)
Daniel H. J. Davis et al.
BMC GERIATRICS (2014)
Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers
Lisa Hartling et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity
Soo Young Kim et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Penny F. Whiting et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2011)
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Julian P. T. Higgins et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)
Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
Andreas Stang
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
GRADE:: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Gordon H. Guyatt et al.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2008)
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Beverley J. Shea et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2007)
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
D Moher et al.
LANCET (2001)
Share Paper
