4.7 Article

Selective microbial electrosynthesis of methane by a pure culture of a marine lithoautotrophic archaeon

Journal

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 50-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.11.004

Keywords

Biocatalysis; Bioelectrochemistry; Carbon dioxide reduction; Extracellular electron transfer; Methanogenesis; Microbial electrosynthesis

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [MA 4819/2-1]
  3. BMBF [Kz: 033RC1101 A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reduction of carbon dioxide to methane by microorganisms attached to electrodes is a promising process in terms of renewable energy storage strategies. However the efficient and specific electrosynthesis of methane by methanogenic archaea on cathodes needs fundamental investigations of the electron transfer mechanisms at the microbe-electrode interface without the addition of artificial electron mediators. Using well-defined electrochemical techniques directly coupled to gas chromatography and surface analysis by scanning electron microscopy, it is shown that a pure culture of the marine lithoautotrophic Methanobacterium-like archaeon strain IM1 is capable to utilize electrons from graphite cathodes for a highly selective production of methane, without hydrogen serving as a cathode-generated electron carrier. Microbial electrosynthesis of methane with cultures of strain IM1 is achieved at a set potential of -0.4V vs. SHE and is characterized by a coulomb efficiency of 80%, with rates reaching 350 nmol d(-1) cm(-2) after 23 days of incubation. Moreover, potential step measurements reveal a biologically catalyzed hydrogen production at potentials more positive than abiotic hydrogen evolution on graphite, indicating that an excessive supply of electrons to strain IM1 results in proton reduction rather than in a further increase of methane production. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available