4.7 Article

Estimation of river pollution source using the space-time radial basis collocation method

Journal

ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 68-79

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.11.019

Keywords

Contaminant source identification; Global space-time collocation model; K-fold cross-validation; Inverse problem; Radial basis function

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41176001]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan project of China [JCYJ20140902110354253]
  3. Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Coastal Ocean Dynamic and Environment [ZDSY20130402163735964]
  4. Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

River contaminant source identification problems can be formulated as an inverse model to estimate the missing source release history from the observed contaminant plume. In this study, the identification of pollution sources in rivers, where strong advection is dominant, is solved by the global space-time radial basis collocation method (RBCM). To search for the optimal shape parameter and scaling factor which strongly determine the accuracy of the RBCM method, a new cost function based on the residual errors of not only the observed data but also the specified governing equation, the initial and boundary conditions, was constructed for the k-fold cross-validation technique. The performance of three global radial basis functions, Hardy's multiquadric, inverse multiquadric and Gaussian, were also compared in the test cases. The numerical results illustrate that the new cost function is a good indicator to search for near-optimal solutions. Application to a real polluted river shows that the source release history is reasonably recovered, demonstrating that the RBCM with the k-fold cross-validation is a powerful tool for source identification problems in advection-dominated rivers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available