4.5 Article

Experimental study and numerical model calibration of full-scale superimposed reinforced concrete walls with I-shaped cross sections

Journal

ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages 1902-1916

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1369433216649392

Keywords

I-shaped cross section; numerical analysis; quasi-static test; semi-precast; superimposed reinforced concrete wall

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51278519, 50908071]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The superimposed reinforced concrete wall in which both the walls and slabs are semi-precast superimposed reinforced concrete components has been widely used to construct high-rise residential buildings in some seismic regions of China. This article aims to investigate the seismic performance and reveal the inherent damage mechanism of this wall. Quasi-static tests of two full-scale superimposed reinforced concrete walls with I-shaped cross sections, consisting of the walls in orthogonal directions and two T-shaped cast-in-place boundary elements, were conducted. Through the test, the behavior of the horizontal joints between the wall panels and the foundation; the behavior of the vertical connections between the wall panels of orthogonal direction; the reliability of the connections between precast and cast-in-place concrete; and the lateral load, deformation, and energy dissipation capacities of the specimens are evaluated. In addition, a refined numerical model based on the multi-spring model was adopted to assess the seismic performance of the superimposed reinforced concrete walls with I-shaped cross sections. The reliability of this model was validated through comparison with the experimental data. This study offers valuable experimental data and numerical model references for future seismic performance assessments of superimposed reinforced concrete wall structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available