4.6 Article

Solar cycle variations of magnetopause locations

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 240-248

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2015.10.012

Keywords

Magnetopause location; F-10.7 flux; Solar cycle; Solar wind velocity

Funding

  1. NASA [NAS5-02099, NNX09AI63G]
  2. German Ministry for Economy and Technology
  3. German Center for Aviation and Space (DLR) [50 OC 0302]
  4. Czech Science Foundation [209/13/22367J, 14-19376S]
  5. National Science Council [NSC 102-2111-M-008-017, NSC 102-2923-M-008-003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The magnetopause location is generally believed to be determined by the solar wind dynamic pressure and by the sign and value of the interplanetary magnetic field vertical (B-z) component. The contribution of other parameters is usually considered to be minor or negligible near the equatorial plane. Recent papers have shown a magnetopause expansion during intervals of a nearly radial IMF but our ability to predict the magnetopause location under steady or slowly changing upstream conditions remains rather weak even if the effect of radial magnetic field is considered. We present a statistical study based on more than 10,000 magnetopause crossings identified in the THEMIS data in the course of the last half of the solar cycle. The observed magnetopause locations are compared with an empirical magnetopause model of Shue et al. (1997) and the sources of differences between observations and model predictions are analyzed. This analysis reveals that the magnetopause location depends on the solar activity being more compressed during the solar maximum. Furthermore, we have found that, beside the solar wind dynamic pressure and vertical magnetic field component, the solar wind speed and ionospheric conductivity (F-10.7 used as a proxy) are important physical quantities controlling this compression. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of COSPAR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available