Journal
ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 224-234Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000125
Keywords
methodological review; mixed methods; nursing
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this review article, we examined the prevalence and characteristics of 294 mixed-methods studies in the discipline of nursing. Creswell and Plano Clark's typology was most frequently used along with concurrent timing. Bivariate statistics was most often the highest level of statistics reported in the results. As for qualitative data analysis, content analysis was most frequently used. The majority of nurse researchers did not specifically address the purpose, paradigm, typology, priority, timing, interaction, or integration of their mixed-methods studies. Strategies are suggested for improving the design, conduct, and reporting of mixed-methods studies in the discipline of nursing.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available