4.2 Article

Structural and Functional Changes With the Aging Kidney

Journal

ADVANCES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 19-28

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.08.004

Keywords

Aging; Nephrosclerosis; Glomerulosclerosis; Kidney function; Glomerular filtration rate

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01 DK090358]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK090358] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Senescence or normal physiologic aging portrays the expected age-related changes in the kidney as compared to a disease that occurs in some but not all individuals. The microanatomical structural changes of the kidney with older age include a decreased number of functional glomeruli from an increased prevalence of nephrosclerosis (arteriosclerosis, glomerulosclerosis, and tubular atrophy with interstitial fibrosis), and to some extent, compensatory hypertrophy of remaining nephrons. Among the macroanatomical structural changes, older age associates with smaller cortical volume, larger medullary volume until middle age, and larger and more numerous kidney cysts. Among carefully screened healthy kidney donors, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines at a rate of 6.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2) per decade. There is reason to be concerned that the elderly are being mis-diagnosed with CKD. Besides this expected kidney function decline, the lowest risk of mortality is at a GFR of >= 75 mL/min/1.73 m(2) for age <55 years but at a lower GFR of 45 to 104 mL/min/1.73 m(2) for age >= 65 years. Changes with normal aging are still of clinical significance. The elderly have less kidney functional reserve when they do actually develop CKD, and they are at higher risk for acute kidney injury. (C) 2016 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available