4.5 Review

Origin and evolution of metabolic sub-cellular compartmentalization in eukaryotes

Journal

BIOCHIMIE
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 262-268

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.03.021

Keywords

Evolution; Eukaryotes; Compartments; Organelles

Funding

  1. Spanish ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BIO2012-37161]
  2. Qatar National Research Fund [NPRP 5-298-3-086]
  3. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP)/ERC [ERC-2012-StG-310325]
  4. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A high level of subcellular compartmentalization is a hallmark of eukaryotic cells. This intricate internal organization was present already in the common ancestor of all extant eukaryotes, and the determination of the origins and early evolution of the different organelles remains largely elusive. Organellar proteomes are determined through regulated pathways that target proteins produced in the cytosol to their final subcellular destinations. This internal sorting of proteins can vary across different physiological conditions, cell types and lineages. Evolutionary retargeting the alteration of a subcellular localization of a protein in the course of evolution has been rampant in eukaryotes and involves any possible combination of organelles. This fact adds another layer of difficulty to the reconstruction of the origins and evolution of organelles. In this review we discuss current themes in relation to the origin and evolution of organellar proteomes. Throughout the text, a special focus is set on the evolution of mitochondrial and peroxisomal proteomes, which are two organelles for which extensive proteomic and evolutionary studies have been performed. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available