4.6 Article

Effects of SAHA and EGCG on Growth Potentiation of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11010023

Keywords

Mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition; breast cancer; DNMT inhibitors; HDAC inhibitors; phytochemicals; microRNA; cancer epigenetics

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA178441, R01 CA204346]
  2. Susan G. Komen Graduate Training in Disparities Research National Award [GTDR15329376]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Triple-negative breast cancer comprises approximately 15-20% of all breast cancers diagnosed and is nearly twice as common in black women than white women in the United States. We evaluated the effects of two epigenetic-modifying compounds on markers of growth potential in several triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor currently used in the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma, was administered to triple-negative breast cancer cells alone or in combination with epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor isolated from green tea. The compounds affected the expression of oncogenic miR-221/222 and tumor suppressors, p27 and PTEN, in addition to estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha). E-cadherin expression was increased while N-cadherin was decreased, indicating a more epithelial phenotype. In addition, the activity of DNMTs was diminished with the treatments, and there was a significant enrichment of AcH3 within the promoter of p27 and PTEN, suggesting a role of epigenetic mechanisms for the aforementioned changes. These results translated to reduced migration of the triple-negative breast cancer cells with the treatments. Together, these findings support the role of SAHA and EGCG in limiting growth and proliferation of breast cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available