4.6 Article

Reducing Surface Recombination Velocities at the Electrical Contacts Will Improve Perovskite Photovoltaics

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 222-227

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b02058

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research (ONR) photovoltaics program and current Award [N00014-17-1-2201]
  2. University of Washington Clean Energy Institute
  3. Washington Research Foundation
  4. University of Washington, Department of Chemistry Kwiram Endowment
  5. Washington Research Foundation innovation fellowship
  6. Mistletoe Foundation research fellowship
  7. Asian Office of Aerospace RD [FA2386-15-1-4106]
  8. ONR [N00014-17-1-2260]
  9. National Science Foundation Research Traineeship [NSF DGE-1633216]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explore the effects of nonradiative recombination at the extracting contacts on the achievable performance of halide perovskite photovoltaic cells. First, we perform device simulations using standard drift-diffusion models with experimental semiconductor parameters matching those of methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI(3)). We quantify the range of surface recombination velocities (SRVs) that would allow this archetypal perovskite to reach power conversion efficiencies of 27%. In particular, for contacts with well-aligned energy levels, SRVs of similar to 1-10 cm/s should enable open-circuit voltages of 1.30 V, within 96% of the Shockley-Queisser limit. Next, we use time-resolved photoluminescence to experimentally determine the SRVs on 14 different common electron- and hole-extracting contacts, including TiO2, SnO2, ZnO, PCBM, ITIC, ICBA, TPBi, PEDOT:PSS, PTAA, PVK, NiO, MoO3, WO3, and spiro-OMeTAD. These results point the way to the selection and rational engineering of better contacts as a means to achieve higher efficiencies in perovskite solar cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available