4.6 Article

Rationalizing and Controlling the Surface Structure and Electronic Passivation of Cesium Lead Halide Nanocrystals

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 63-74

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01669

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union through the FP7 (ERC Starting Grant NANOSOLID) [306733]
  2. Swiss Federal Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) [18614.1 PFNM-NM]
  3. Swiss National Foundation (SNF Ambizione Energy) [PZENP2_154287]
  4. Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research (NWO) through the Innovational Research Incentive (Vidi) Scheme [723.013.002]
  5. Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research (NWO) through the Innovational Research Incentives (Veni) Scheme [722.017.011]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZENP2_154287] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colloidal lead halide perovskite nanocrystals (NCs) have recently emerged as versatile photonic sources. Their processing and luminescent properties are challenged by the lability of their surfaces, i.e., the interface of the NC core and the ligand shell. On the example of CsPbBr3 NCs, we model the nanocrystal surface structure and its effect on the emergence of trap states using density functional theory. We rationalize the typical observation of a degraded luminescence upon aging or the luminescence recovery upon postsynthesis surface treatments. The conclusions are corroborated by the elemental analysis. We then propose a strategy for healing the surface trap states and for improving the colloidal stability by the combined treatment with didodecyldimethylammonium bromide and lead bromide and validate this approach experimentally. This simple procedure results in robust colloids, which are highly pure and exhibit high photoluminescence quantum yields of up to 95-98%, retained even after three to four rounds of washing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available