4.4 Article

Effect of expansive agent and internal curing agent on crack resistance of C50 silica fume wet-mix shotcrete

Journal

ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1687814018819167

Keywords

Shotcrete; silica fume; crack resistance; expansive agent; internal curing agent

Funding

  1. National Key research and development plan [2016YFC0401610]
  2. National science fund project [51739008]
  3. Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund [Y418008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-strength shotcrete is always needed to strengthen rock support. However, it will reversely increase the crack risk. Crack normally goes against the durability and shortens the service life of shotcrete. The objective of this article was to improve the crack resistance of shotcrete with expansive agent and internal curing agent. C50 shotcrete with 10% of silica fume was taken as reference mix composition. Ring test and thermal stress test simulating actual temperature, relative humidity, and constraint were carried out to directly assess crack resistance. Restrained deformation, autogenous volume deformation, and pore structure were measured to study how expansive agent and internal curing agent resisted crack. The results indicated that 4% of expansive agent was enough to improve crack resistance of C50 shotcrete. It could fill internal pores and produce compressive pre-stress at earlier age which could be used to compensate shrinkage at later age. Furthermore, the crack resistance of C50 shotcrete could be further promoted when internal curing agent was employed together with expansive agent. The internal curing agent was able to reduce auto-shrinkage by decreasing the loss of internal relative humidity. In addition, it could also enhance the hydration degree of expansive agent, which would strengthen the role of expansive agent on resisting crack.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available