4.6 Article

Deep Learning-Based Multi-Omics Data Integration Reveals Two Prognostic Subtypes in High-Risk Neuroblastoma

Journal

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00477

Keywords

deep learning; high-risk neuroblastoma; multi-omics data integration; MYCN amplification; machine learning

Funding

  1. China Human Proteome Project [2014DFB30010, 2014DFB30030]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0902100]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671377, 81472369, 81502144]
  4. Shanghai 111 Project [B14019]
  5. Clinical Application Research Funds of Capital Beijing [Z171100001017051]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-risk neuroblastoma is a very aggressive disease, with excessive tumor growth and poor outcomes. A proper stratification of the high-risk patients by prognostic outcome is important for treatment. However, there is still a lack of survival stratification for the high-risk neuroblastoma. To fill the gap, we adopt a deep learning algorithm, Autoencoder, to integrate multi-omics data, and combine it with K-means clustering to identify two subtypes with significant survival differences. By comparing the Autoencoder with PCA, iCluster, and DGscore about the classification based on multi-omics data integration, Autoencoder-based classification outperforms the alternative approaches. Furthermore, we also validated the classification in two independent datasets by training machine-learning classification models, and confirmed its robustness. Functional analysis revealed that MYCN amplification was more frequently occurred in the ultra-high-risk subtype, in accordance with the overexpression of MYC/MYCN targets in this subtype. In summary, prognostic subtypes identified by deep learning-based multiomics integration could not only improve our understanding of molecular mechanism, but also help the clinicians make decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available