4.5 Article

Prognostic role of derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in surgical triple-negative breast cancer

Journal

CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 4891-4898

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S180695

Keywords

dNLR; TNBC; inflammation; immunity; prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The role of derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) in predicting the prognosis of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has not been well studied. Here, we attempted to investigate the significance of dNLR in predicting the prognosis of patients with surgical (nonmetastatic) TNBC. Methods: A total of 281 patients diagnosed with surgical TNBC in The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China from February 2005 to March 2015 were retrospectively included in this study. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis was used to assess the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). We used Cox regression model to assess the prognostic significance of pretreatment dNLR and other clinicopathological parameters in TNBC patients. Results: The median DFS in TNBC patients who had low dNLR and high dNLR was 28.9 and 15.1 months (P<0.001), respectively, whereas the median OS in patients who had low dNLR and high dNLR was 71.2 and 42.3 months (P<0.001), respectively. In patients aged <= 50 years and with invasive ductal carcinoma, a low dNLR predicted better DFS and OS compared with a high dN I R. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the increased dNLR was a risk factor o f poor DFS (HR=1.90, 95% CI: 1.52-2.46, P=0.007) and OS (HR=2.56, 95% CI: 1.69-3.58, P=0.001). Conclusion: Pretreatment dNLR is an independent factor of prognosis for TNBC patients, which potentially allows clinical doctors to improve outcomes of patients with high dNLR by treating with aggressive therapy, such as high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available