4.7 Article

Porous nitrogen/halogen dual-doped nanocarbons derived from imidazolium functionalized cationic metal-organic frameworks for highly efficient oxygen reduction reaction

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages 671-680

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40843-018-9364-5

Keywords

cationic metal-organic framework; imidazolium; nitrogen/halogen dual-doped; nanocarbon catalysts; oxygen reduction reaction

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0208600]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB845605]
  3. Key Research Program of Frontier Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDJ-SSW-SLH045]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB20000000]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21671188, 21871263, 21521061, 21331006]
  6. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2014265]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heteroatom-doped carbon materials as alternative catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) have drawn increasing attention due to their tunable chemical and electronic structures for achieving high activity and stability. However, there still remains a great challenge to fabricate porous heteroatoms dual-doped carbons with uniformly doping in a facile and controllable way. Herein, imidazole/imidazolium-functionalized metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are employed as precursors and templates to achieve porous nitrogen and halogen dual-doped nanocarbons. Among these carbon materials, the as-prepared nitrogen/bromine dual-doped catalyst BrNC-800 exhibits the best ORR performance with a positive half-wave potential at 0.80 V (vs. RHE) in 0.1 mol L-1 KOH, which is comparable to the benchmark commercial 20 wt% Pt/C catalyst. BrNC-800 shows excellent long term stability and methanol tolerance. This work provides a facile approach to fabricate highly efficient heteroatoms dual-doped carbon catalysts for energy conversion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available