4.7 Article

A Kansei evaluation approach based on the technique of computing with words

Journal

ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 1-15

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2015.11.001

Keywords

Kansei evaluation; Preference modeling; Kansei clustering; Linguistic aggregation; Computing with words

Funding

  1. I-Shou University, Taiwan [ISU-104-04-01A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kansei evaluation plays a vital role in the implementation of Kansei engineering; however, it is difficult to quantitatively evaluate customer preferences of a product's Kansei attributes as such preferences involve human perceptual interpretation with certain subjectivity, uncertainty, and imprecision. An effective Kansei evaluation requires justifying the classification of Kansei attributes extracted from a set of collected Kansei words, establishing priorities for customer preferences of product alternatives with respect to each attribute, and synthesizing the priorities for the evaluated alternatives. Moreover, psychometric Kansei evaluation systems essentially require dealing with Kansei words. This paper presents a Kansei evaluation approach based on the technique of computing with words (CWW). The aims of this study were (1) to classify collected Kansei words into a set of Kansei attributes by using cluster analysis based on fuzzy relations; (2) to model Kansei preferences based on semantic labels for the priority analysis; and (3) to synthesize priority information and rank the order of decision alternatives by means of the linguistic aggregation operation. An empirical study is presented to demonstrate the implementation process and applicability of the proposed Kansei evaluation approach. The theoretical and practical implications of the proposed approach are also discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available