4.7 Review

Tumor lymphangiogenesis and new drug development

Journal

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 148-160

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.12.011

Keywords

Anti-lymphangiogenic drug; Metastasis; Lymph node; Clinical trial; Lymphatic endothelial cell; Tumor-associated inflammation

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation grant [310030B_147087]
  2. European Research Council grant LYVICAM
  3. Leducq Foundation Transatlantic Network of Excellence grant Lymph Vessels in Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease [11CVD03]
  4. Oncosuisse
  5. Krebsliga Zurich
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030B_147087] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditionally, tumor-associated lymphatic vessels have been regarded as passive by-standers, serving simply as a drainage system for interstitial fluid generated within the tumor. However, with growing evidence that tumors actively induce lymphangiogenesis, and that the number of lymphatic vessels closely correlates with metastasis and clinical outcome in various types of cancer, this picture has changed dramatically in recent years. Tumor associated lymphatic vessels have now emerged as a valid therapeutic target to control metastatic disease, and the first specific anti-lymphangiogenic drugs have recently entered clinical testing. Furthermore, we are just beginning to understand the whole functional spectrum of tumor-associated lymphatic vessels, which not only concerns transport of fluid and metastatic cells, but also includes the regulation of cancer stemness and specific inhibition of immune responses, opening new venues for therapeutic applications. Therefore, we predict that specific targeting of lymphatic vessels and their function will become an important tool for future cancer treatment. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available