4.7 Review

Engineering cell-based therapies to interface robustly with host physiology

Journal

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages 55-65

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.05.019

Keywords

Mammalian synthetic biology; Biosensors; Cell-based therapies; Gene circuits

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health T32 Training Grant through Northwestern University's Biotechnology Training Program [GM 008449]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [W911NF-11-2-0066]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Engineered cell-based therapies comprise a rapidly growing clinical technology for treating disease by leveraging the natural capabilities of cells, including migration, information transduction, and biosynthesis and secretion. There now exists a substantial portfolio of intracellular and extracellular sensors that enable bioengineers to program cells to execute defined responses to specific changes in state or environmental cues. As our capability to construct more sophisticated cellular programs increases, assessing and improving the degree to which cell based therapies perform as desired in vivo will become an increasingly important consideration and opportunity for technological advancement. In this review, we seek to describe both current capabilities and potential needs for building cell-based therapies that interface with host physiology in a manner that is robust - a phrase we use in this context to describe the achievement of therapeutic efficacy across a range of patients and implementations. We first review the portfolio of sensors and outputs currently available for use in cell-based therapies by highlighting key advancements and current gaps. Then, we propose a conceptual framework for evaluating and pursuing robust clinical performance of engineered cell-based therapies. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available