4.6 Article

Ductile-regime machining model for ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting of brittle materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages 68-76

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.029

Keywords

Ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting; Ductile-regime machining; Brittle materials; Critical depth of cut

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51405315]
  2. Laboratory of Precision Manufacturing Technology, CAEP [KF15002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting (UEVC) is attracting much attention in ultra-precision machining of brittle materials as it was found be able to effectively increase the critical depth of cut (d(c)) of brittle materials. However, the mechanisms for the increased d(c) are still not fully understood. In this study, a ductile-regime machining model was developed for the UEVC of brittle materials to achieve maximum d(c) and thus the maximum machining efficiency. It shows that the reasons for the increase of d(c) are: (1) The actual undeformed chip thickness (UCT) is smaller than the nominal depth of cut (DOC); (2) The distance from transient surface to target surface (DTSTS) can endure the crack propagation within a certain range when UCT exceeds the critical UCT (t(c)). Based on the ductile-regime machining model, a predictive model was developed for the determination of d(c) in microgroove plunge-cutting with respect to several determining factors, including DTSTS, UCT, t(c) and length of the crack (C-m). A series of experiments on plunge-cutting of KDP crystal were conducted. Results showed that the predicted d(c) match well with the experimental ones. In addition, it was found that d(c) increases as the amplitude of vibration along the cutting direction increases or the cutting speed decreases, and d(c) increases first and then decreases as the amplitude of vibration along the thrust direction increases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available