4.5 Review

Comparative analysis of smoking cessation smartphone applications available in 2012 versus 2014

Journal

ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 175-181

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.026

Keywords

Smoking; Smoking cessation; Smartphone; Apps; Applications; Mobile; Behaviour change intervention; Behaviour change techniques; Taxonomy; BCTs; Engagement; Ease-of-use; Content analysis

Funding

  1. National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training (NCSCT)
  2. Cancer Research UK
  3. Ministry for Innovation, Science and Research of the German Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW-Ruckkehrprogramm)
  4. Cancer Research UK [14135] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007489/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/K023195/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aims: Smartphone applications (apps) offer a potentially cost-effective and a wide-reach aid to smoking cessation. In 2012, a content analysis of smoking cessation apps suggested that most apps did not adopt behaviour change techniques (BCTs), which according to previous research had suggested would promote higher success rates in quitting smoking. This study examined whether or not, this situation had changed by 2014 for free smoking cessation apps available in the Apple App Store. It also compared the use of engagement and ease-of-use features between the two time points. Methods: 137 free apps available in the Apple App Sore in 2014 were coded using an established framework for the presence or absence of evidence-based BCTs, and engagement and ease-of-use features. The results from the 2014 data were compared with a similar exercise conducted on 83 free apps available in 2012. Results: BCTs supporting identity change, rewarding abstinence and advising on changing routines were less prevalent in 2014 as compared with 2012 (14.6% vs. 42.2%, 18.2% vs. 482%, and 175% vs. 24.1%, respectively). Advice on coping with cravings and advice on the use of stop-smoking medication were more prevalent in 2014 as compared with 2012 (27.7% vs. 20.5% and 14.6% vs 3.6%, respectively). The use of recognised engagement features was less common in 2014 than in 2012 (453% vs. 69.6%) while ease-of-use features remained very high (945% vs. 82.6%). Conclusion: There was little evidence of improvement in the use of evidence-based BCTs in free smoking cessation iPhone-based apps between 2012 and 2014. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available