4.7 Article

Type 2 diabetes is causally associated with depression: a Mendelian randomization analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS OF MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 678-687

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11684-018-0671-7

Keywords

causal modeling; depression; Mendelian randomization; type 2 diabetes

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81471062, 81471059, 81500660, 81561128019]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFC1305600, 2016YFC1304904, 2018YFC1311705]
  3. National International Science Cooperation Foundation [2015DFA30560]
  4. Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support of the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [20152508, 20161301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been associated with a high prevalence of depression.We aimed to determine the causal relation by performing a Mendelian randomization (MR) study using 34 T2D risk genetic variants validated in East Asians as the instrumental variable (IV). An MR analysis was performed involving 11 506 participants from a large longitudinal study. The T2D genetic risk score (GRS) was built using the 34 typical T2D common variants. We used T2D_GRS as the IV estimator and performed inverse-variance weighted (IVW) and Egger MR analysis. The T2D_GRS was found to be associated with depression with an OR of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.07-1.37) after adjustments for age, sex, body mass index, current smoking and drinking, physical activity, education, and marital status. Using T2D_GRS as the IV, we similarly found a causal relationship between genetically determined T2D and depression (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.25-2.70). Though we found no association between the combined effect of the genetic IVs for T2D and depression with EggerMR(OR: 0.95, 95%CI: 0.42-2.14), we found an association for T2D and depression with IVW (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.31-2.46) after excluding pleiotropic SNPs. Overall, the MR analyses provide evidence inferring a potential causal relationship between T2D and depression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available