Journal
EARTHS FUTURE
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 1603-1615Publisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018EF000991
Keywords
-
Funding
- National Science Foundation EAR Postdoctoral Fellowship [1625150]
- Community Foundation of New Jersey
- National Science Foundation [ICER-1663807]
- NASA grant [80NSSC17K0698]
- Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 [MOE218-T2-1-030]
- National Research Foundation Singapore
- Singapore Ministry of Education, under the Research Centres of Excellence initiative
- International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project [639]
- Directorate For Geosciences
- Division Of Earth Sciences [1625150] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The modern era of scientific global-mean sea level rise (SLR) projections began in the early 1980s. In subsequent decades, understanding of driving processes has improved, and new methodologies have been developed. Nonetheless, despite more than 70 studies, future SLR remains deeply uncertain. To facilitate understanding of the historical development of SLR projections and contextualize current projections, we have compiled a comprehensive database of 21st century global SLR projections. Although central estimates of 21st century global-mean SLR have been relatively consistent, the range of projected SLR has varied greatly over time. Among studies providing multiple estimates, the range of upper projections shrank from 1.3-1.8 m during the 1980s to 0.6-0.9 m in 2007, before expanding again to 0.5-2.5 m since 2013. Upper projections of SLR from individual studies are generally higher than upper projections from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, potentially due to differing percentile bounds or a predisposition of consensus-based approaches toward relatively conservative outcomes. Plain Language Summary In spite of more than 35 years of research, and over 70 individual studies, the upper bound of future global-mean sea level rise (SLR) remains deeply uncertain. In an effort to improve understanding of the history of the science behind projected SLR, we present and analyze the first comprehensive database of 21st century global-mean SLR projections. Results show a reduction in the range of SLR projections from the first studies through the mid-2000s that has since reversed. In addition, results from this work indicate a tendency for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports to err on the side of least drama-a conservative bias that could potentially impede risk management.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available