4.6 Article

Advancing patient-centered care for structurally vulnerable drug-using populations: a qualitative study of the perspectives of people who use drugs regarding the potential integration of harm reduction interventions into hospitals

Journal

ADDICTION
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 685-694

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/add.13214

Keywords

Drug users; harm reduction; health services; hospitals; patient-centered care; qualitative

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA033147, U01 DA038886] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsTo explore the perspectives of structurally vulnerable people who use drugs (PWUD) regarding: (1) the potential integration of harm reduction interventions (e.g. supervised drug consumption services, opioid-assisted treatment) into hospitals; and (2) the implications of these interventions for patient-centered care, hospital outcomes and drug-related risks and harms. DesignSemi-structured qualitative interviews. SettingVancouver, Canada. ParticipantsThirty structurally vulnerable PWUD who had been discharged from hospital against medical advice within the past 2years, and hospitalized multiple times over the past 5years. MeasurementsSemi-structured interview guide including questions to elicit perspectives on hospital-based harm reduction interventions. FindingsParticipant accounts highlighted that hospital-based harm reduction interventions would promote patient-centered care by: (1) prioritizing hospital care access and risk reduction over the enforcement of abstinence-based drug policies; (2) increasing responsiveness to subjective health needs (e.g. pain and withdrawal symptoms); and (3) fostering culturally safe' care. ConclusionsHospital-based harm reduction interventions for people who use drugs, such as supervised drug consumption services and opioid-assisted treatment, can potentially improve hospital care retention, promote patient-centered care and reduce adverse health outcomes among people who use drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available