3.8 Article

Cancellous-Bone-like Porous Iron Scaffold Coated with Strontium Incorporated Octacalcium Phosphate Nanowhiskers for Bone Regeneration

Journal

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 509-518

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01188

Keywords

porous iron; bone scaffold; electrodeposition; octacalcium phosphate; bone repair

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0700803]
  2. Fundamental Research Program of Shenzhen [JCYJ20170307110418960]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The repair of large bone defects poses a grand challenge in tissue engineering. Thus, developing biocompatible scaffolds with mechanical and structural similarity to human cancellous bone is in great demand. Herein, we fabricated a three-dimensional (3D) porous iron (Fe) scaffold with interconnected pores via a template-assisted electrodeposition method. The porous Fe scaffold with a skeleton diameter of 143 mu m had the porosity >90%, an average pore size of 345 mu m, and a yield strength of 3.5 MPa. Such structure and mechanical strength were close to those of cancellous bone. In order to enhance the biocompatibility of the scaffold, strontium incorporated octacalcium phosphate (Sr-OCP) was coated on the skeletons of the porous Fe scaffold. The coated Sr-OCP was in the form of nanowhiskers with a mean diameter of 300 nm and length of 30 mu m. Such Sr-OCP coating could effectively reduce the release rate of the Fe ions to a level which was safe for the human body. Both in vitro cytotoxicity tests by extraction method and direct contact assay confirmed that the Sr-OCP coating could promote the cell adhesion and substantially enhance the biocompatibility of the porous Fe scaffolds. Thus, the cancellous-bone-like porous structure with compatible mechanical properties and excellent biocompatibility enables the present Sr-OCP coated porous Fe scaffold to be a promising candidate for bone repair and regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available