4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

The urgency of Arctic change

Journal

POLAR SCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 6-13

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2018.11.008

Keywords

Arctic; Global change; Sea ice; Climate projections; 2 degrees C limit; Cryosphere

Funding

  1. Nordic Council of Ministers
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [14.W.03.31.0006]
  3. Academy of Finland [304467]
  4. Arctic Research Project of the NOAA Climate Program Office
  5. Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (JISAO) under NOAA [NA15OAR4320063, 2018-0139]
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [304467, 304467] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides a synthesis of the latest observational trends and projections for the future of the Arctic. First, the Arctic is already changing rapidly as a result of climate change. Contemporary warm Arctic temperatures and large sea ice deficits (75% volume loss) demonstrate climate states outside of previous experience. Modeled changes of the Arctic cryosphere demonstrate that even limiting global temperature increases to near 2 degrees C will leave the Arctic a much different environment by mid-century with less snow and sea ice, melted permafrost, altered ecosystems, and a projected annual mean Arctic temperature increase of +4 degrees C. Second, even under ambitious emission reduction scenarios, high-latitude land ice melt, including Greenland, are foreseen to continue due to internal lags, leading to accelerating global sea level rise throughout the century. Third, future Arctic changes may in turn impact lower latitudes through tundra greenhouse gas release and shifts in ocean and atmospheric circulation. Arctic-specific radiative and heat storage feedbacks may become an obstacle to achieving a stabilized global climate. In light of these trends, the precautionary principle calls for early adaptation and mitigation actions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available