4.1 Article

Sputum Moraxella catarrhalis strains exhibit diversity within and between COPD subjects

Journal

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S180961

Keywords

COPD; Moraxella catarrhalis; strain change; exacerbation

Funding

  1. Airway Disease Predicting Outcomes through Patient Specific Computational Modeling (AirPROM) project
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Respiratory Biomedical Center
  3. MRC UK (COPDMAP)
  4. NIHR
  5. MRC [G0801980, G0601369] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Moraxella catarrhalis is implicated in the pathogenesis of some COPD exacerbations. We sought to investigate whether the M. catarrhalis strain is variable between COPD subjects; that an exacerbation is associated with acquisition of a new strain and that certain strains are more commonly associated with exacerbations. Patients and methods: Sputum samples were collected at stable and exacerbation visits from COPD subjects from a single center as part of the COPDMAP consortium. Samples identified as M. catarrhalis positive by qPCR were recultured in liquid cultures grown to extract genomic DNA; underwent Illumina MiSeq and bacterial genome sequences were de novo assembled and Multi Locus Sequence Type (MLST) was determined. Results: Thirty-five samples were obtained from 18 subjects. These included 13 stable and 22 exacerbation samples. The diversity between samples was very large with 25 different M. catarrhalis MLSTs being identified out of the 35 samples of which 12 MSLTs have not been described previously. Change and persistence of M. catarrhalis strain were observed between stable visits, from stable to exacerbation and vice-a-versa, and between exacerbation visits. Conclusion: Sputum M. catarrhalis strains exhibit marked diversity within and between COPD subjects. Acquisition of a new strain is common between stable and exacerbation events such that no strain is specifically associated with an exacerbation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available