4.5 Review

Two Forms of Electrical Transmission Between Neurons

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00427

Keywords

synaptic communication; electrical synapse; gap junction; electric field; ephapsis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DC03186, DC011099, NS055726, NS085772, NS0552827]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R21NS055726, R21NS085772] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [R01DC011099, R29DC003186, R01DC003186, R56DC003186] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrical signaling is a cardinal feature of the nervous system and endows it with the capability of quickly reacting to changes in the environment. Although synaptic communication between nerve cells is perceived to be mainly chemically mediated, electrical synaptic interactions also occur. Two different strategies are responsible for electrical communication between neurons. One is the consequence of low resistance intercellular pathways, called gap junctions, for the spread of electrical currents between the interior of two cells. The second occurs in the absence of cell-to-cell contacts and is a consequence of the extracellular electrical fields generated by the electrical activity of neurons. Here, we place present notions about electrical transmission in a historical perspective and contrast the contributions of the two different forms of electrical communication to brain function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available