4.3 Article

Human amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote osteogenesis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells against glucolipotoxicity

Journal

FEBS OPEN BIO
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 74-81

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12547

Keywords

glucolipotoxicity; human amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cells; human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; osteogenic differentiation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670966, 81672678]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) [2014-37]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiological evidence suggests that diabetes mellitus (DM) is an important factor in promoting periodontitis. It not only affects the attachment of connective tissue but also causes loss of alveolar bone. Hence, there is an urgent need to find an effective treatment for DM-induced bone deficiency. This study aimed to investigate the effects of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells (HAMSCs) on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of DM-induced human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (HBMSCs). High glucose and palmitic acid (GP) were used to mimic DM-induced glucolipotoxicity. The proliferation levels were measured using flow cytometry. Alkaline phosphatase activity substrate assays, Alizarin red S staining, and western blotting were used to investigate osteogenic differentiation. Oxidative stress was measured by assaying the levels of reactive oxygen species. This study found that glucolipotoxicity caused by GP remarkably inhibited cell proliferation and osteogenesis, and upregulated the oxidative stress level in HBMSCs. However, HAMSCs attenuated HBMSC dysfunction through antioxidant activity by influencing p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor secretion. In conclusion, our findings indicate that HAMSCs might be suitable for treating DM-mediated bone deficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available