4.7 Article

Genotypic diversity and clinical outcome of cryptococcosis in renal transplant recipients in Brazil

Journal

EMERGING MICROBES & INFECTIONS
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 119-129

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2018.1562849

Keywords

Cryptococcus neoformans; Cryptococcus gattii; molecular type; renal transplantation; genotypic diversity

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [CAPES 7571-13-8]
  2. National Council of Technological and Scientific Development [CNPQ 307510/2015-8]
  3. Public Health Service Grants [AI73896, AI04533, AI93257]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genotypic diversity and fluconazole susceptibility of 82 Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii isolates from 60 renal transplant recipients in Brazil were characterized. Clinical characteristics of the patients and prognostic factors were analysed. Seventy-two (87.8%) isolates were C. neoformans and 10 (12.2%) were C. gattii. VNI was the most common molecular type (40 cases; 66.7%), followed by VNII (9 cases; 15%), VGII (6 cases; 10%), VNB (4 cases; 6.7%) and VNI/II (1 case; 1.7%). The isolates showed a high genetic diversity in the haplotype network and six new sequence types were described, most of them for VNB. There was a bias towards skin involvement in the non-VNI population (P = .012). VGII isolates exhibited higher fluconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations compared to C. neoformans isolates (P = 0.008). The 30-day mortality rate was 38.3%, and it was significantly associated with fungemia and absence of headache. Patients infected with VGII had a high mortality rate at 90 days (66.7%). A variety of molecular types produce disease in renal transplant recipients in Brazil and highlighted by VGII and VNB. We report the clinical appearance and impact of the molecular type, fluconazole susceptibility of the isolates, and clinical characteristics on patient outcome in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available