4.2 Article

Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging for malignant and benign pulmonary nodule differentiation: a preliminary study

Journal

ACTA RADIOLOGICA
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 19-26

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0284185116639763

Keywords

Diffusion kurtosis imaging; non-Gaussian imaging; lung cancer; pulmonary nodule

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has demonstrated inconsistent results in pulmonary nodule differentiation. Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), which quantifies non-Gaussian diffusion, is believed to better characterize tissue micro-structure than conventional DWI. Purpose To assess the feasibility of DKI in human lungs and to compare its diagnostic value with standard DWI in differentiating malignancies from benign pulmonary nodules. Material and Methods Thirty-five pulmonary nodules in 32 consecutive patients were evaluated by DKI by using 3b-values of 0, 500, and 1000s/mm(2) and conventional DWI with b values of 0 and 800s/mm(2). Two observers independently evaluated and compared diagnostic accuracy of mean kurtosis (MK) and ADC values in differentiating malignancies from benign pulmonary nodules. The intra- and inter-observer repeatability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]) were also assessed for each derived measures. Results The diagnostic accuracy, and the area under curve (AUC) in differentiating malignancies from benign pulmonary nodule, were not significantly higher for MK (Obs. 1a: 85.70%, 0.87; Obs. 1b: 80.00%, 0.80; and Obs. 2: 82.80%, 0.91) as compared to ADC (Obs. 1a: 77.14%, 0.81; Obs. 1b: 80.00%, 0.85; and Obs. 2: 77.14%, 0.85 respectively). The intra- and inter-observer agreement (ICC) for malignant and benign lesions was substantial for each reading. Conclusion The initial results of this study indicate the feasibility of DKI in human lungs. However, there was no significant benefit of DKI derived MK values over ADC for malignant and benign pulmonary nodule differentiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available