4.3 Article

Human papillomavirus (HPV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in keratinizing versus non- keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx

Journal

INFECTIOUS AGENTS AND CANCER
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13027-018-0205-6

Keywords

EBV; HPV; Oral; Oropharyngeal; Cancer; HPV-induced p16(INK4A) immunohistochemistry; Co-infection

Funding

  1. Fondo di Ateneo Quota Competitiva - University of Milano-Bicocca [2016-ATESP-0032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundOral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC and OPSCC) represent the majority of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Human papillomavirus (HPV) is an important etiologic factor together with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Little is known on the prevalence of major herpesviruses [EBV, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and HHV-6, -7 and-8] in HNSCCs.MethodsFifty-one formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples taken at surgery (40 oropharyngeal, 11 oral) were analyzed for 40 HPV genotypes (20 high-risk types), EBV, CMV, HHV-6, -7 and-8 by quantitative PCR. Expression of the HPV-induced p16(INK4A) protein was also investigated by immunohistochemistry (IHC).ResultsIn SCC, the prevalence of EBV was significantly higher compared to that of HPV (EBV 51% vs. HPV 19.5%; P=0.005). HPV infection was found in 25% of OPSCC and in none of the OSCC; conversely, higher prevalence of EBV was found in OSCC (72.7%). HPV and EBV co-infection was detected only in 4 (10%) OPSCC. CMV was detected in only two cases, whereas HHV-6, -7 and-8 resulted negative. The prevalence of HPV but no EBV was associated with the non-keratinizing SCC type (NKSCC) compared to the keratinizing SCC type (KSCC)(HPV-DNA P<0.005; EBV=0.054).ConclusionsSingle HPV or EBV positivity was higher in OSCC than in OPSCC. Other potentially oncogenic herpesvirus types were minimally or not represented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available