4.8 Article

Decreased brain connectivity in smoking contrasts with increased connectivity in drinking

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.40765

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81701773, 11771010, 71661167002, 91630314]
  2. Shanghai Sailing Program [17YF1426200]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [18ZR1404400]
  4. The Shanghai AI Platform for Diagnosis and Treatment of Brain Diseases
  5. Base for Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B18015]
  6. Key Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Plan [15JC1400101, 16JC1420402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a group of 831 participants from the general population in the Human Connectome Project, smokers exhibited low overall functional connectivity, and more specifically of the lateral orbitofrontal cortex which is associated with non-reward mechanisms, the adjacent inferior frontal gyrus, and the precuneus. Participants who drank a high amount had overall increases in resting state functional connectivity, and specific increases in reward-related systems including the medial orbitofrontal cortex and the cingulate cortex. Increased impulsivity was found in smokers, associated with decreased functional connectivity of the non-reward-related lateral orbitofrontal cortex; and increased impulsivity was found in high amount drinkers, associated with increased functional connectivity of the reward-related medial orbitofrontal cortex. The main findings were cross-validated in an independent longitudinal dataset with 1176 participants, IMAGEN. Further, the functional connectivities in 14-year-old non-smokers (and also in female low-drinkers) were related to who would smoke or drink at age 19. An implication is that these differences in brain functional connectivities play a role in smoking and drinking, together with other factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available