4.6 Article

Experimental Evidence for Hot Exciton Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Emitters

Journal

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.201801190

Keywords

hot excitons; organic light-emitting devices; reverse intersystem crossing; thermally activated delayed fluorescence

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61420106002, 51373189, 21772209]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project [2016YFB0401004]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contradiction between no effective photophysical experiments and high device results causes the hot exciton thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) mechanism to be still a controversial question. Here, the steady and transient photophysical characterization combined with theoretical calculation based on 4,7-bis(9,9-dimethyl-9H-fluoren-2-yl)-5,6-difluorobenzo [c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (2F-BTH-DMF), 4,7-bis(9,9-dimethyl-9H-fluoren-2-yl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (BTH-DMF), and 5,6-bis(9,9-dimethyl-9H-fluoren-2-yl)benzo[c][1,2,5] thiadiazole (o-BTH-DMF) demonstrate that all the emitters exhibit TADF via reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) from hot exciton triplet excited state. The fast RISC process hot exciton mechanism affords a very short delayed lifetime (1 mu s). Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) based on these emitters exhibit high exciton utilization over 25% and the best device shows a maximum current efficiency of 31.02 cd A(-1), maximum power efficiency of 27.85 lm W-1, and external quantum efficiency of 9.13%, which are the highest performances for reported OLEDs with hot exciton mechanism. The experimental evidence for fast RISC process via hot exciton triplet state and short delayed lifetime highlights the TADF emitters with hot exciton mechanism for high-performance OLEDs with very low efficiency roll-off.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available