4.6 Article

Low-Cost and High-Performance Microporous Metal-Organic Framework for Separation of Acetylene from Carbon Dioxide

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 1667-1672

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05431

Keywords

Porous material; Acetylene; Gas separation; Functional sites; Gas selectivity; Molecular sieving

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51472217, 51432001]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR13E020001, LZ15E020001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015QNA4009, 2016FZA4007, 2018QNA4010]
  4. Welch Foundation [AX-1730]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Separation of acetylene (C2H2) from carbon dioxide (CO2) is very difficult and challenging because of their similar molecular sizes and associated physical properties. Realization of low-cost and high-performance porous materials is of importance to facilitate the implementation of energy-efficient adsorptive separation into practical gas separation applications. Here, we utilized a cheap and commercially available formic acid ligand to successfully construct a robust MOF material [Ni-3(HCOO)(6)center dot DMF] (1DMF), offering high chemical stability, low cost, and high selectivity toward C2H2 over CO2. The exceptional separation performance of the activated 1 is mainly attributed to the small pore size (4.3 angstrom) and functional O donor sites on the pore walls that provide strong binding affinity toward C2H2, as revealed by the detailed computational studies. This material thus exhibits ultrahigh low-pressure C2H2 uptake (38.2 cm(3) cm(-3) at 0.01 bar and 298 K) and possesses a high C2H2/CO2 selectivity (22.0 at ambient conditions), comparable to other leading porous materials. The high separation performance of 1 was further confirmed by the actual breakthrough experiments on a 50/50 C2H2/CO2 mixture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available