4.6 Article

A Search for Natural Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents Based on Natural Components

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 2933-2942

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03520

Keywords

Hydrophobic DESs; DES properties; DES leaching; Riboflavin extraction; Viscosity; Density

Funding

  1. ISPT Deep Eutectic Solvents in the pulp and paper industry consortium
  2. Bio-Based Industries Joint Undertaking under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [668970]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [668970] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) based on terpenes are identified and characterized. 507 combinations of solid components are tested, which results in the identification of 17 new hydrophobic DESs. Four criteria are introduced to assess the sustainability of these hydrophobic DESs from a chemical engineering point of view. These criteria include a viscosity smaller than 100 mPa.s, a density difference between DES and water of at least 50 kg.m(-3) upon mixing of the DES and water, low transfer of the DES to the water phase and minor to no pH change. The results show that five new hydrophobic DESs based on natural components satisfy these criteria; thymol and coumarin (2:1), thymol and menthol (1:1), thymol and coumarin (1:1), thymol and menthol (1:2) and 1-tetradecanol and menthol (1:2), and thus are promising DESs. These new DESs can be considered as natural deep eutectic solvents, which have the potential to be environmentally friendly. A selected group of the hydrophobic DESs were used for the extraction of riboflavin from water. They all show higher removal of riboflavin in comparison to decanoic acid:tetraoctylammonium bromide (2:1). The highest extraction efficiency of riboflavin from water, 81.1%, was achieved with the hydrophobic DES DecA:Lid (2:1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available