3.9 Article

Cardiac computed tomography previous to atrial fibrillation ablation - effects of technological improvements and protocol optimization

Journal

REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA
Volume 37, Issue 11, Pages 873-883

Publisher

ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2018.03.011

Keywords

Cardiac computed tomography; Atrial fibrilation; Radiation dose; Left atrium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) can provide a precise tridimentional anatomic map and exclude intra-cardiac thrombus. We aimed to access the impact of CT protocol optimization and technological evolution on the contrast and radiation dose as well as on image quality previous to atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods: From a prospective registry of consecutive patients who underwent cardiac CT in a single center, we selected 270 patients in whom the CT was done for evaluation prior to AF ablation and they were distributed in 3 groups: Group1: the first 150 patients included; Group2: the last 60 patients performed with the same CT scanner; Group3: the first 60 exams performed with the new CT scanner. Quality of the protocol was access based on radiation dose, contrast volume used, the use of a second (delayed) acquisition, and on quantitative image quality analisis (signal to noise and contrast to noise ratios; density homogeneity racio between LA and LAA). Results: We found a significant radiation dose as well as contrast dose reduction between the first and last subgroups (G1: 5,6 mSv and 100 ml; G2: 1,3 mSv and 90 ml; G3: 0,6 mSv and 65 ml). Even though group 3 had less radiation and contrast used it still had better quantitative image quality (signal/noise of 13,5; contrast/noise 14,8; density homogeneity racio of 0,92). Conclusion: Protocol optimization and technology both contributed to significant lower radiation dose and contrast volume used on cardiac CTs prior to AF ablation, without compromising image quality. (C) 2018 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available