4.3 Article

Multi-environment Genomic Prediction of Plant Traits Using Deep Learners With Dense Architecture

Journal

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages 3813-3828

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/g3.118.200740

Keywords

GBLUP; deep learning; neural network; genomic prediction; prediction accuracy; GenPred; Shared Data Resources

Funding

  1. CIMMYT CRP (maize and wheat)
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  3. USAID project (Cornell University)
  4. USAID project (Kansas State University)
  5. Foundation for Research Levy on Agricultural Products (FFL)
  6. Agricultural Agreement Research Fund (JA) in Norway through NFR grant [267806]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genomic selection is revolutionizing plant breeding and therefore methods that improve prediction accuracy are useful. For this reason, active research is being conducted to build and test methods from other areas and adapt them to the context of genomic selection. In this paper we explore the novel deep learning (DL) methodology in the context of genomic selection. We compared DL methods with densely connected network architecture to one of the most often used genome-enabled prediction models: Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP). We used nine published real genomic data sets to compare a fraction of all possible deep learning models to obtain a meta picture of the performance of DL methods with densely connected network architecture. In general, the best predictions were obtained with the GBLUP model when genotypexenvironment interaction (GxE) was taken into account (8 out of 9 data sets); when the interactions were ignored, the DL method was better than the GBLUP in terms of prediction accuracy in 6 out of the 9 data sets. For this reason, we believe that DL should be added to the data science toolkit of scientists working on animal and plant breeding. This study corroborates the view that there are no universally best prediction machines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available