4.8 Article

A Combination of Two Human Monoclonal Antibodies Prevents Zika Virus Escape Mutations in Non-human Primates

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 1385-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.031

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy
  2. NIH (NIGMS)
  3. NIH (National Cancer Institute)
  4. NIH [1R21AI129479-01, U19AI111825, UL1TR001866, R01AI037526, UM1AI100663, P01AI138938, R01AI124690, U19AI057229]
  5. Lyda Hill
  6. Rockefeller University Development Office
  7. Office of Research Infrastructure Programs/OD [P51OD011107]
  8. Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology Department
  9. Molecular Observatory at Caltech
  10. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  11. Robertson Therapeutic Development Fund
  12. Pew Latin American Fellows Program in the Biomedical Sciences
  13. Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zika virus (ZIKV) causes severe neurologic complications and fetal aberrations. Vaccine development is hindered by potential safety concerns due to antibody cross-reactivity with dengue virus and the possibility of disease enhancement. In contrast, passive administration of anti-ZIKV antibodies engineered to prevent enhancement may be safe and effective. Here, we report on human monoclonal antibody Z021, a potent neutralizer that recognizes an epitope on the lateral ridge of the envelope domain III (EDIII) of ZIKV and is protective against ZIKV in mice. When administered to macaques undergoing a high-dose ZIKV challenge, a single anti-EDIII antibody selected for resistant variants. Co-administration of two antibodies, Z004 and Z021, which target distinct sites on EDIII, was associated with a delay and a 3-to 4-log decrease in peak viremia. Moreover, the combination of these antibodies engineered to avoid enhancement prevented viral escape due to mutation in macaques, a natural host for ZIKV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available