4.5 Article

Extended database of SO2 column densities over Pakistan by exploiting satellite observations

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 997-1003

Publisher

TURKISH NATL COMMITTEE AIR POLLUTION RES & CONTROL-TUNCAP
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2019.01.009

Keywords

Sulfur dioxide; Ozone monitoring instrument (OMI); Differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS); Volcanic eruption; Thermal power generation; Seasonal trend

Funding

  1. National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing levels of atmospheric SO2 is a major threat and is now widely included in health risk assessment studies. An annual estimation of SO2 has been conducted for both anthropogenic and natural activities at country level. Satellite observations of atmospheric sulfur dioxide (SO2) are obtained over Pakistan during the time span of 2005-2016. The data was acquired from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) onboard NASA's Aura satellite. DOAS (Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) based algorithm was utilized to retrieve SO2 column densities. In addition to spatio-temporal analysis of SO2 column, seasonal cycles over major areas of Pakistan are evaluated and discussed. Year 2007, 2011 exhibited anomalous high levels of SO2 attributed to trans-boundary volcanic plumes observed in Pakistan. SO2 plumes were caused by Dallafilla and Nabro volcanic eruption and spread over East African, the Middle Eastern and South Asian regions. A temporal increase of about 78% was observed in anthropogenic SO2 levels for a period of 2005-2016 across Pakistan. Further, the relative change was maximum in Khyber Pakhtoon Khwa (KPK region 46%) followed by Punjab (38%), Sindh (28%) and Baluchistan (18%), respectively. The economic prosperity in recent years resulted in increased demand for energy by both the industrial and domestic sector, and consequent increase in SO2 emissions in Pakistan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available