4.6 Article

Comparative safety and effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for Alzheimer's disease: a network meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials

Journal

ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13195-018-0457-9

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Cholinesterase inhibitors; Memantine; Network meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundCholinesterase inhibitors and memantine have been approved for management of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but there has been no consensus about the choice of various types and doses of drugs at different stages. Hence, we compared and ranked the efficacy and tolerability of these available drugs.MethodsWe searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to July 21, 2017. The primary outcomes were the mean overall changes in cognitive function and responders who had any adverse events. We conducted a random-effects network meta-analysis.ResultsForty-one RCTs were included in this study. Compared with placebo, galantamine 32mg daily (standardized mean difference -0.51, 95% credible interval -0.67 to -0.35), galantamine 24mg daily (-0.50, -0.61 to -0.40), and donepezil 10mg daily (-0.40, -0.51 to -0.29) were probably the most effective agents on cognition for mild to moderate AD, and memantine 20mg combined with donepezil 10mg (0.76, 0.39 to 1.11) was recommended for moderate to severe patients. Memantine showed the best profile of acceptability. Rivastigmine transdermal 15-cm(2) patch was the best optional treatment both in function and global changes. None of the medicines was likely to improve neuropsychiatric symptoms through this analysis.ConclusionsPharmacological interventions have beneficial effects on cognition, function, and global changes, but not on neuropsychiatric symptoms, through current network meta-analysis. The choice of drugs may mainly depend on the disease severity and clinical symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available