4.7 Article

Predictors of developing Mycobacterium kansasii pulmonary disease within 1 year among patients with single isolation in multiple sputum samples: A retrospective, longitudinal, multicentre study

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36255-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [NSC101-3114-Y-002-003, MOST104-2321-B-002-058, MOST 107-2314-B-037 -106 -MY3]
  2. Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Research Program [KMUH105-5M09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The clinical significance of a single Mycobacterium kansasii (MK) isolation in multiple sputum samples remains unknown. We conducted this study to evaluate the outcome and predictors of developing MK-pulmonary disease (PD) within 1 year among these patients. Patients with a single MK isolation from >= 3 sputum samples collected within 3 months and >= 2 follow-up sputum samples and chest radiography in the subsequent 9 months between 2008 and 2016 were included. The primary outcome was development of MK-PD within 1 year, with its predictors explored using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A total of 83 cases of a single MK isolation were identified. The mean age was 68.9 +/- 17.9, with a male/female ratio of 1.96. Within 1 year, 16 (19%) cases progressed to MK-PD; risk factors included high acid-fast smear (AFS) grade (>= 3), elementary occupation workers, and initial radiographic score > 6, whereas coexistence with other nontuberculous mycobacterium species was protective. Among patients who developed MK-PD, all experienced radiographic progression, and 44% died within 1 year. Although a single MK isolation does not fulfil the diagnostic criteria of MK-PD, this disease may develop if having above-mentioned risk factors. Early anti-MK treatment should be considered for high-risk patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available