4.1 Article

A new floating piezoelectric microphone for the implantable middle ear microphone in experimental studies

Journal

ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA
Volume 136, Issue 12, Pages 1248-1254

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1201590

Keywords

Floating piezoelectric microphone; implantable middle ear microphone; totally implantable cochlear implant

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271084, 81170926, 81500785, 81000413, 81370022, 81200740, 81200738, 81371093]
  2. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB504500, 2011CB504506]
  3. Innovation Project of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [11411952300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conclusions: The new floating piezoelectric microphone is feasible for use as an implantable middle ear microphone in a totally implantable cochlear implant. Objectives: A piezoelectric sensor that is driven by the acoustic vibration of the ossicles is one possible design for a microphone for a totally implantable cochlear implant. Such a new floating piezoelectric microphone has been manufactured in the lab. The purpose of this article was to study the frequency response of the new floating piezoelectric microphone in the intact ossicular chain and to identify whether it is usable and implantable. Methods: The frequency response of the new floating piezoelectric microphone was analyzed using in vitro testing of fresh cadaveric heads. The microphone, which was designed with an integrated unibody structure to ensure good biocompatibility and capsulation, was attached to the long process of the incus by a titanium clip, or placed in the tympanic cavity and stimulated with pure tones of different frequencies. Results: The new floating piezoelectric microphone can pick up the vibration of the long process of the incus and convert it into electrical signals sensitively and flatly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available