4.7 Article

Lipidomic Response to Coffee Consumption

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu10121851

Keywords

coffee; caffeine; lipids; biomarkers; trial; lysophosphatidylcholine; lipidomics

Funding

  1. American Diabetes Association (ADA) [7-13-JF-15]
  2. Institute of Scientific Information on Coffee
  3. Ministry of Culture and Science of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (MKW NRW)
  4. German Federal Ministry of Health (BMG)
  5. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coffee is widely consumed and contains many bioactive compounds, any of which may impact pathways related to disease development. Our objective was to identify individual lipid changes in response to coffee drinking. We profiled the lipidome of fasting serum samples collected from a previously reported single blinded, three-stage clinical trial. Forty-seven habitual coffee consumers refrained from drinking coffee for 1 month, consumed 4 cups of coffee/day in the second month and 8 cups/day in the third month. Samples collected after each coffee stage were subject to quantitative lipidomic profiling using ion-mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry. A total of 853 lipid species mapping to 14 lipid classes were included for univariate analysis. Three lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) species including LPC (20:4), LPC (22:1) and LPC (22:2), significantly decreased after coffee intake (p < 0.05 and q < 0.05). An additional 72 species mapping to the LPC, free fatty acid, phosphatidylcholine, cholesteryl ester and triacylglycerol classes of lipids were nominally associated with coffee intake (p < 0.05 and q > 0.05); 58 of these decreased after coffee intake. In conclusion, coffee intake leads to lower levels of specific LPC species with potential impacts on glycerophospholipid metabolism more generally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available