4.2 Review

Assessing copy number aberrations and copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity across the genome as best practice: An evidence-based review from the Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC) working group for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Journal

CANCER GENETICS
Volume 228, Issue -, Pages 236-250

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.07.004

Keywords

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); Cytogenetics; Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA); Copy number alterations (CNAs); Copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity (CN-LOH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prognostic role of cytogenetic analysis is well-established in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Approximately 80% of patients have a cytogenetic aberration. Interphase FISH panels have been the gold standard for cytogenetic evaluation, but conventional cytogenetics allows detection of additional abnormalities, including translocations, complex karyotypes and multiple clones. Whole genome copy number assessment, currently performed by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), is particularly relevant in CLL for the following reasons: (1) copy number alterations (CNAs) represent key events with biologic and prognostic significance; (2) DNA from fresh samples is generally available; and (3) the tumor burden tends to be relatively high in peripheral blood. CMA also identifies novel copy number variants and copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity (CN-LOH), and can refine deletion breakpoints. The Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC) Working Group for CLL has performed an extensive literature review to describe the evidence-based clinical utility of CMA in CLL. We provide suggestions for the integration of CMA into clinical use and list recurrent copy number alterations, regions of CN-LOH and mutated genes to aid in interpretation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available