4.7 Article

Cells Lacking the RB1 Tumor Suppressor Gene Are Hyperdependent on Aurora B Kinase for Survival

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 230-247

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0389

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)
  2. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  3. NCI/NIH R35 grant [R35CA210068]
  4. NCI/NIH K08 grant [K08CA208008-01, K08CA222657]
  5. Lung Cancer Research Foundation
  6. Breast Cancer Now
  7. Cancer Research UK
  8. Wellcome Trust
  9. NIH [CA213404-20]
  10. Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award for Medical Scientists (CAMS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 15% of lung cancers and is almost always linked to inactivating RB1 and TP53 mutations. SCLC frequently responds, albeit briefly, to chemotherapy. The canonical function of the RB1 gene product RB1 is to repress the E2F transcription factor family. RB1 also plays both E2F-dependent and E2F-independent mitotic roles. We performed a synthetic lethal CRISPR/Cas9 screen in an RB1(-/-)SCLC cell line that conditionally expresses RB1 to identify dependencies that are caused by RB1 loss and discovered that RB1(-/-)SCLC cell lines are hyperdependent on multiple proteins linked to chromosomal segregation, including Aurora B kinase. Moreover, we show that an Aurora B kinase inhibitor is efficacious in multiple preclinical SCLC models at concentrations that are well tolerated in mice. These results suggest that RB1 loss is a predictive biomarker for sensitivity to Aurora B kinase inhibitors in SCLC and perhaps other RB1(-/-)cancers. SIGNIFICANCE: SCLC is rarely associated with actionable protooncogene mutations. We did a CRISPR/Cas9-based screen that showed that RB1(-/-)SCLC are hyperdependent on AURKB, likely because both genes control mitotic fidelity, and confirmed that Aurora B kinase inhibitors are efficacious against RB1(-/-)SCLC tumors in mice at nontoxic doses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available